El pueblo que falta y el agujero de la democracia

In this paper, the author claims that radical political inmanentism, such as Deleuze’s and Spinoza’s in Deleuze’s reading, is not compatible with the project of vanguardism that authors as Negri, Hardt or Virilio, among others, have tried to justify departing from Deleuze. The author discusses the legitimacy of those readings and concludes that it is possible and much more plausible to think politics from a Deleuzian perspective as a project capable of legitimating a Maquiavelian democratic State.

View Fullscreen

Deja un comentario

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *